Force Training and the Courts law enforcement Based on TrainingLiability in Use of Deadly Force, analyze the findings of Zuchel v.Denver and Popow v. City of Margate. How did each of these courtcases influence law enforcement training? What must a municipality or agencyensure in order to limit their liability? If the organization’s training isdeemed inadequate, is the liability of the organization affected by whether or notthe individual acted outside the limits of his or her training?The paper must be two to three pages in length and formatted according toAPA style. You must use at least two scholarly sources (at least one ofwhich can be found in the Ashford University Library) other than the textbookto support your claims and subclaims. Cite your resources in text and on thereference pageImportant, All questions need answered thanks list references anyquestions please ask Force Training and the Courts Law Enforcement It is important to provide anall-round training to the law enforcers. It is not proper to have an untrainedofficer carrying out security duties that may cause danger to innocentcivilians. In the Popow v. City ofMargate, an officer shot an innocent person as he pursued a kidnapper onfoot. The court ruled that the training offered to the enforcement officer wasinadequate. The case is influential in law enforcement training in that itprovides for the areas under which officers are supposed to be trained on. Itshows that the training on the use of deadly force alone is not sufficient insome situations. Officers need training in handling moving suspects. They alsorequire training on shooting in areas that have low lighten (Ryan, n.d). Thetraining should consider the aspect of shooting at residential areas; theofficers need to know how to operate under those areas that put innocent peopleat risk. The Zuchel v. Denver case is about officers responding to a disturbancecase in a fast food restaurant where one officer ended up killing a suspect whowould otherwise have been arrested by the other officer. The case provides asituation that shows that the officers did not have sufficient training. Thecase shows that the methods used for training are not sufficient enough; theuse of films and lectures is not comprehensive enough for an officer to handlesome situations. The case brings out another aspect of training wherebytraining of the officers must put into consideration the environments thatofficers may face while on duty. It also emphasizes on regular firearm training(Ryan, n.d). A critical area that needs to be introduced is the training ofdecision-making skills. The skills are to help the officers in deciding thesituations that require deadly use of force, which will help agencies avoidliability. A municipality or agency shouldensure a couple of actions in order to limit their liability. One of the keyissues is to have adequate resources to enable the municipality to maintainquality training programs (Petrowski, 2002). The training should not just bethe usual enforcement officer training, it should be tailor made to fit in thecurrent trends. The agency needs to pick up the developing issue that can causeliability and train the officers on those as they come. None of the developingissues should be ignored, as it may turn up to be disastrous over time. The agencies and municipalities needto have updated policies on training. The polices should be reviewed from timeto time to ensure that they are relevant in the current times (Shtmllair etal., 2011). The policies created need to be able to adapt to change. Forexample, the officer in the Zuchel v.Denver case had training on shoot and don’t shoot, which was not enough tohandle the situation as the officer needed decision making skills. Themunicipalities and agencies need also to be ready to spend on certain topicsthat may be expensive, but very important in the short or long run. The expensivetrainings can be spared for some officers and only them can handle cases insuch areas. It is also important to have a continuous in house training programto promote continuous improvement (Petrowski, 2002). The trainers should think of all possiblescenarios and try and find ways that will help the officers to handle suchcases without causing a liability to the municipality or the agency. If the organization’s training isdeemed inadequate, the liability of the organization is affected by whether ornot the individual acted outside the limits of his or her training. It isexpected that officers must get the ideal training in order to handle differentcases. In some cases, the officer is supposed to use common knowledge to dealwith a situation in which case the agency is not liable. In the event that theofficer acts in a way that would have been as a result of inadequate training,then the agency or the municipality’s liability is affected.ReferencesPetrowski, T. D. (2002). Use-of-Force Policies and Training aReasoned Approach. FBI Law EnforcementBulletin, 71(10), 25Ryan, J.(n.d.). Training liability in use of deadly force. Retrieved fromhttp://www.patc.com/weeklyarticles/uof_training-liability.Shtmllair,J. P., Pollock, J., Montague, D., Nichols, T., Curnutt, J., & Burns, D.(2011).Reasonablenessand Reaction Time. Police Quarterly, 14(4),323. Doi: 10.1177/1098611111423737can you please look over for me make any changes
You can hire someone to answer this question! Yes, essay96.com has paper writers dedicated to completing research and summaries, critical thinking tasks, essays, coursework, and other homework tasks. It's fast and safe.