Kizza (2014) addressed network attacksand intrusions broadly

Kizza (2014) addressed network attacksand intrusions broadly as “cybercrime” and attributed them largely tomoral and ethical deficiencies of the perpetrators. Lessig (2006)approached law in the network largely in terms of computer “code” thatdefines what can and cannot be done with the network. In other words,Lessig (2006) found the issue of what is a crime and who bearsresponsibility to be more ambiguous than does Kizza.Search the Internet to find two examples ofactivities that meet the definition of cybercrime. Then briefly summarize your examples andapply and criticize Kizza’s (2014) and Lessig’s (2006) positions onwhat constitutes a crime and who is responsible for the activitiesdescribed in your examples. Identify at least two of the stated orunstated assumptions that underlie each of Kizza’s (2014) or Lessig’s(2006) arguments and specify at least two practical implications. DoesKizza’s (2014) or Lessig’s (2006) position apply better to either orboth of your examples?***Discuss and cite both (Kizza’s 2014) Computer NetworkSecurity and Cyber Ethics and Lessig’s (2006) Code and Other Laws ofCyberspace) and at least one additional credible, scholarly source tosupport your analysis and positions. *** Don’t forget the reference page and three in text citations ***

You can hire someone to answer this question! Yes, essay96.com has paper writers dedicated to completing research and summaries, critical thinking tasks, essays, coursework, and other homework tasks. It's fast and safe.