Management of Information Security course. Information Security Cost-Benefit Analysis

Can you help me understand this Management question?

Hello,

Here are the instructions for this assignment:

Using the risk management prioritization and rating you created in the previous activity, create a cost-benefit analysis. In other words, describe the assets and the cost of these assets as well as the cost of protecting these assets. Include items that affect the cost of a particular risk treatment strategy, including implementing new or improved safeguards under the defense option. Examples include the cost of hardware, software, services, training, installation of software, configuration, testing, vendor fees, maintenance, and cost from the loss of these assets.

MGMT 394 5.4 Hands-On Rubric

MGMT 394 5.4 Hands-On Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content and Development

30.0 pts (Excellent – A) Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or clearly stated and well supported. Responses are excellent, timely, and address activity, including course concepts. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated.

26.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Content is accurate and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or stated. Responses are adequate and address assignment. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated

23.0 pts (Average – C) Content is not comprehensive and/or persuasive. Major points are addressed, but not well supported. Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.

20.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. Questions were not adequately answered or demonstrated.

17.0 pts (Failing – F) Demonstrates unacceptable mastery of content. Few or no requirements of the activity are included in the response.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization and Structure

30.0 pts (Excellent – A) Structure of the activity is clear and easy to follow. Demonstrates excellent flow of thought. Activity is organized and structured in a manner that provides a clear representation of a finished product.

26.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow. Finished product is presented.

23.0 pts (Average – C) Structure of activity is difficult to follow. Product is not finished or if present does not flow from the rest of the activity.

20.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Organization and structure detract from the rest of the activity. Points are disjointed and lack in transition of thought.

17.0 pts (Failing – F) Structure is absent or not consistent. Organization is not apparent and inaccurate. Presentation and delivery are unacceptable.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis

25.0 pts (Excellent – A) Analyses are organized in a logical manner, clearly presented, and titled properly. Activity is easy to understand by a lay reader and directly addresses the research questions.

22.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Analyses are sufficient in number, but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. Analyses are on topic, but may not perfectly reflect the research questions posed.

19.0 pts (Average – C) Insufficient analyses/reflection are included. Anayses/reflections do not adequately address the questions posed. Analyses/reflections are not well organized or clear.

17.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Analyses/reflections are partially included, but are not clear or organized.

14.0 pts (Failing – F) Does not demonstrate ability to analyze assumptions and evaluate evidence, complexity of issues, and alternatives.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Format

15.0 pts (Excellent – A) Activity demonstrates all designated guidelines in a clear and consise manner with proper formatting. Format enhances readability of work. Demonstrates excellent ability to use technology and tools effectively to enhance the finished product.

13.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Activity follows all guidelines and technology/tools are used to format the activity appropriately demonstrating a finished product.

11.0 pts (Average – C) Activity follows most guidelines. Formatting is not consistent and does not represent a finished product.

9.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Activity lacks many elements of formatting.

7.0 pts (Failing – F) Activity is not formatted at all.

15.0 pts

WHY SHOULD YOU HIRE EXPERT ACADEMIC WRITERS?

Answering this question is not essay as it seems. It will require you to research or burn your brain power, write your findings down, edit, proofread severally, and submit unsure of the grade you will get. Essay96.com assignment writers are offering to take care of that. Order your assignment now, relax, submit, and enjoy excellent grades. We guarantee you 100% original answers, timely delivery, and some free products.

>>ORDER NOW<<

>>SEE TOP WRITERS<<

Posted in Uncategorized