Please review the videos and follow the rubric posted below

Can you help me understand this Engineering question?

Panama Canal Case Study: Please review the videos and follow the rubric posted below.

https://youtu.be/QqatexpnJt8

https://youtu.be/L-Nh5t3O4jA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
_bJNR9pzxio

For each of the three case studies, students will prepare an assessment of between 1,100 and 1,200 words of text, 1.5 spaced. Each case study should have a separate bibliography including at least 2 references (not including the videos), using APA format. Header and bibliography does not count towards word count. Each assessment should have:
  1. Title
  2. Topic sentence (a single sentence or two which summarize the student’s understanding of the situation, the actions taken by the consulting engineer, and lessons learned)
  3. Situation assessment (What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?)
  4. Lessons learned (this should include not just the lessons learned by the consulting engineer as expressed in the case study, but the lessons learned by the student looking at the case study as a whole)

Rubric

Summer 2020 Case Study Rubric

Summer 2020 Case Study Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle

2.5 pts

Full Marks

Title present.

0.0 pts

No Marks

Title not present.

2.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic Sentence

2.5 pts

Full Marks

A single sentence or two which summarize the student’s understanding of the situation, the actions taken by the consulting engineer, and lessons learned.

0.0 pts

No Marks

Topic sentence not present.

2.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSituation Assessment

15.0 pts

Full Marks

The following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?

8.0 pts

Partial Marks

Some of the following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?

0.0 pts

No Marks

None of the following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of ESEM Principles

15.0 pts

Full Marks

ESEM principles are mentioned and discussed in the essay.

8.0 pts

Partial Marks

ESEM principles are mentioned but not discussed in the essay.

0.0 pts

No Marks

ESEM principles are not mentioned or discussed in the essay.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLessons Learned

10.0 pts

Full Marks

Lessons of the consultant engineer and the student are present.

5.0 pts

Partial Marks

Only lessons learned by the consultant engineer or the student are present.

0.0 pts

No Marks

No lessons learned are present.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBetween 1,100 and 1,200 Words

20.0 pts

Full Marks

Within given range.

10.0 pts

Partial Marks

Within 100 words over or under.

0.0 pts

No Marks

Under 1,000 words or above 1,300 words.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProper Grammar and Spelling

20.0 pts

Full Marks

No errors or minor grammar and spelling errors.

10.0 pts

Partial Points

Spelling and grammar errors distract from essay.

0.0 pts

No Marks

Spelling and grammar errors make essay incomprehensible.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1.5 Spacing

5.0 pts

Full Marks

1.5 spacing used.

0.0 pts

No Marks

1.5 spacing not used.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2 ReferencesCredit only awarded for the following two criteria if 2 references are present.

0.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

0.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn-text APA Citations

5.0 pts

Full Marks

In-text APA citations present.

0.0 pts

No Marks

No in-text citations or APA not used.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Bibliography

5.0 pts

Full Marks

APA bibliography present.

0.0 pts

No Marks

No bibliography or APA not used.

WHY SHOULD YOU HIRE EXPERT ACADEMIC WRITERS?

Answering this question is not essay as it seems. It will require you to research or burn your brain power, write your findings down, edit, proofread severally, and submit unsure of the grade you will get. Essay96.com assignment writers are offering to take care of that. Order your assignment now, relax, submit, and enjoy excellent grades. We guarantee you 100% original answers, timely delivery, and some free products.

>>ORDER NOW<<

>>SEE TOP WRITERS<<

Posted in Uncategorized